Nick-Davis.com: 100 Favorite Films
|
|
#66: Magnolia
(USA, 1999; dir. Paul Thomas Anderson; cin. Robert Elswit; with John C. Reilly, Philip Baker Hall, Tom Cruise, Melora Walters,
Jeremy Blackman, William H. Macy, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jason Robards, April Grace, Julianne Moore, Melinda Dillon, Michael Bowen, Alfred Molina,
Eileen Ryan, Felicity Huffman, Luis Guzmán, Henry Gibson, Cleo King, Craig Kvinsland, Ricky Jay, Michael Murphy, Don McManus, Thomas Jane)
IMDb // My Page
One of my favorite moments at the movies happens when the lights go down and, whether through electronics or pulleys or some
other device, the margins of the screen are adjusted to suit the aspect ratio of the film. This instant, disappointingly
pre-empted whenever the screen is sized before our arrival, is most titillating when the panels or curtains keep moving,
moving, moving past the point of expectation, exhilarating the still-blank screen with the pure, implied scope of what is
about to come. Like it was yesterday, I remember the side-panels at Magnolia parting so widely they almost didn't
quit, as though making room for a locomotive or a stampede or a Biblical exodus.
Hurl a stone in a contemporary movieplex and you're bound to hit some screen where a passel or fleet of Los Angelenos fumble
their way toward self-consciousness, corraled by the freeways into smaller and smaller circles until we realize that they
all already know each other. But Magnolia, in contrast to most of these movies, barely bothers to fix its locale as
a worldly place, a place of real, waking lives. Magnolia, as wide and colorful as someone's bursting imagination,
knocks its fluorescent scenes of kilowatted personal crises against one another, lighting faces so brightly that they pool
with black shadows even bigger than personality, listing and tracking through hallways and suites and offices and conference
rooms until the movie feels like a series of aftershocks. But they aren't tectonic aftershocks. They are psychic reverberations,
prodigious ones, even in a movie whose off-kilter score, outsized characters, and rudimentary plot conflicts abolish any
sense of realism. Is it too much to say the film derealizes psychology, even as it spelunks straight downward into its
grottiest crevicesfathers who menace their daughters, sons who abjure their fathers, women trying to scale some
terrible epiphanies just as they are dawning? Somehow, Anderson's baton-twirling virtuosity with his camera evaporates
even more irony than it introduces, since the characters are, almost universally, experiencing their lives just as floridly
as the film portrays them. Jason Robards' canker of angry loneliness, Julianne Moore's centrifugal self-dispersal, April
Grace's surgical defrocking of Tom Cruise's panther pride (where is she now, when we most need her?), Jeremy Blackman's
suffocation within his absorbent genius, Melinda Dillon's bitter medicinethese are all delectably reckless acting
turns, a fine vintage of supporting performances packed into one robust buffet. But there's an idea inside all of this
rococo reaching, because at least as I experience the movie, its tragic aspirations only work because of how, in the
film's relentlessly forward and sideways velocity, all of the most extreme emotional states get windshield-wipered by all
the other ones. No one's breakdown stands in much relief from anyone else's, and California, America, the now, they all
become a pop-art collage of interchangeable secrets and miseriesthe source, too, of all the vividness and life in the
movie, so we're never less than thankful for them. Anderson doesn't add these figures into any polemical sum, just one
film's picture of the way things are, possessed of rather less variety than the sprawling cast and shifting style imply.
Amidst all of this, the song (you know) and the frogs (you know) feel much less incongruous than the movie's two hints of
connection: a stammering policeman's date with an addict and, even more miraculously, a relay of awkward telephone calls
that succeeds against all odds at locating the person it seeks. Amazingly, John C. Reilly and Philip Seymour Hoffman, two
congenital over-actors, have finally found this least likely of movies in which to rein it all in and offer compelling,
affecting snapshots of the normal. Threshold of revelation!
It's the nature of the beast that Magnolia teeters too far in some directions: young Stanley's soliloquy of protest
is one too many, and a bit much for the mouth of a babe; Reilly's procedural mishap with his gun just sits inert on the
screen, haphazardly slung together; and William H. Macy's scenes are aggravatingly garish in text and image. But who cares,
compared to all the goodies tucked around the movie in unexpected cracks and corners: Cleo King's insolence and Felicity
Huffman's observant invisibility, a great performance from some invisible actress who convinces Frank T.J. Mackey to contact
his father, the hilarious production design of the What Do Kids Know? quiz show, the comic-book blue of Tom Cruise's
black hair, Macy being dogged by the same truncated pop song, the epidemic rash of dissolves into Robards' poisoned lungs,
the sound of toads hitting pavement, the wry question "Do you still want the peanut butter, cigarettes, and bread?", and
every single cut that joins a symmetrical shot with some violence against balance, often a chiaroscuro close-up pushing
against the edge of that wide, wide frame. I liked Anderson's Boogie Nights but have been blithely indifferent to
any impulse to re-see it; I savored the sound and technique of Punch-Drunk Love, but I admit to having craved a more
populated party; I have owned Hard Eight on second-hand VHS for almost five years and still haven't popped it in.
But Magnolia seduces, pulls, lures me in, time and again, as though it has some gravitational pull. Flamboyant
characters make their way through a world that is and isn't ours, and I can't stop watching.
|
|