Nick-Davis.com: 100 Favorite Films
|
|
#65: Female Perversions
(USA, 1996; dir. Susan Streitfeld; cin. Teresa Medina; with Tilda Swinton, Amy Madigan, Karen Sillas, Dale Shuger, Frances Fisher,
Laila Robbins, Clancy Brown, Paulina Porizkova, Marcia Cross)
IMDb // My Page
In a just world, not to mention an extremely entertaining one, Susan Streitfeld's Female Perversions would hold the
utopian potential to unite two truly disparate audiences: first, the academic eggheads who know that the movie, virtually
alone in the modern cinema, is a fictionalized adaptation of a monograph of psychoanalytic literary theory, and second,
the swells of tabloid-chasers and thrill-seekers ushered toward the movie by the title alone. It would be easy, and probably
right, to say that Female Perversions is unlikely to match the expectations of either audience, but I think it's more
interesting to consider how the movie actually rewards them both, at least partially. Scholastic theory on gender and
sexuality can sometimes be so desiccated of the juices and shivers and intimate, saucy introspection through which sex is
actually lived and breathed; on the other hand, standard-issue erotic thrillers and sexploitation films are often bizarrely
disarmed of any guiding concept of what actually is sexy, or of what actually inhibits sex, or rhymes with it, or
assumes its value when sex itself isn't available or, for whatever reason, desired on its own terms. Female Perversions,
not just because it melds Freudian archetypes and fleshy, femmey spectacle, possesses a genuinely erotic flavor. It has the
sexiest thing a movie can have: a distinct point of view, persuasively showing us what this director, or at least this
film, considers titillating, pedestrian, shameful, furtive, funny.
Tilda Swinton stars as a hotshot lawyer named Eve. Right off the bat, you can tell that subtlety isn't the movie's elected
forte, and yet, why and how Swinton's character is an "Eve" is hard to pin down. A rising star on the legal circuit with a
prestigious judgeship all but guaranteed to come her way, she embodies a mix of professional competence and self-alienation
that isn't exactly unfamiliardon't all professional women in American movies eventually realize that they don't know
who they are?and yet, because she's played by Swinton, Eve's unraveling doesn't feel conventional. Instead, it's a
strangely out-of-body experience, navigated by the only Brechtian actress working in modern film, whose masklike and yet
disarmingly lucid face always works in ironic tandem with her stiffly elegant body. Surrounding Swinton are a clutch of
other women who were case studies and paragons in Dr. Louise J. Kaplan's original book (full title: Female Perversions:
The Temptations of Emma Bovary), and whom the screenplay by director Streitfeld and co-writer Julie Hébert
determinedly maroon somewhere between being characters and ciphers. Amy Madigan, a coiled and arrestingly spiteful actress,
has her finest hour here as Madeleine, the black-sheep sister of Swinton's powerful up-and-comer. Madigan shoplifts a silk
scarf with a memorable glower, she all but deliberately sabotages her sister's professional coronation, and she manages the
neat trick of constantly messing everything up for everyone in the movie (including for herself) without sacrificing the
audience's interest. Frances Fisher blowzes around as a good-time girl, Laila Robins is tearful as a dressmaker in a
trailer, Paulina Porizkova strides through her scenes as an immaculately tailored rival of Swinton's, and Karen Sillasan
underrated and much-missed presence from Tom Noonan's What Happened Was... and some Hal Hartley filmsstands
toe-to-toe with Swinton as one of two lovers whom the bisexual Eve keeps stringing along. Marcia Cross puts in a mysterious
cameo, basically the same shot repeated several times, as Swinton and Madigan's abused mother, and an unknown, almost
androgynous waif named Dale Shuger slides even more slivers of unease beneath your skin as Edwina, a teenaged girl who
flees from all the parodic female visions around her, retreating into an intensely private life of scarring her flesh and
burying the pads and tissues stained with her ovulated blood.
The plot uniting all of this is never Female Perversions' strongest hook, and neither the final act of the picture
nor the embedded flashbacks and dream-visions have the strange, arresting depth of the scenes where the characters just
orbit and strut around each other, like Caryl Churchill characters transported to the American Southwest: indolent, almost,
yet full of curiosity-sparking contradictions. The production design, particularly in Eve's coldly modernist office and in
the most Kubrickian lingerie boutique you'll ever see, amplifies our confusion about where the movie is really happening:
is this story all on the surface, nothing more than the sum of its aggressively allegorical symbols, or does some threshold
of revelation await us beneath all the layers of intentional affectation? Female Perversions plays like some
mathematical proof you keep wracking your brain against, trying to derive the absolute value of Woman, or maybe even of
Gender. (The movie's tagline read, "It's all about power," and fans of Butler or Foucault will eat it up like double-chocolate
mousse.) Happily, the cul-de-sacs and errant stabs at solution are actually more rewarding than the half-hearted "explanations"
behind all of this theatre. Meanwhile, any drama that can boast three or four truly interesting women, and cast such peculiar
and palpably brainy actresses in the roles, is not a gift to question. In fact, the film radiates an almost totemic mystique,
no less so because it has become rather hard to find, and tends to pop up in unexpected places: like, say, the "Special
Interest" Shelf at BestBuy, better known for stocking the onanistic oeuvres of Traci Lords. Porizkova, a presence for only
two short scenes, lounges around in bedsheets on the box art, from which Swinton is entirely erased, and you don't have to
look hard to find Zalman King's name among the co-producers. But as they say, good things come in smutty packages.
|
|